IS ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE WOKE, RACIST, OR IN BETWEEN? – Freedoms Phoenix

IS ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE WOKE, RACIST, OR IN BETWEEN?

Author: Jerry Day

Below is a conversation I had with Open AI’s ChatGPT on 1/15/2023. While starting “innocently”, the questions were deliberately provocative, designed to see how ChatGPT is “trained”, how it thinks, and how much it is influenced by human input. The questions were tailored to “find the edges” of the ChatGPT AI bot, what it can do, how it thinks, how “intelligent” it is and what powers and limitations it has.

This “conversation” was very revealing not only of the ChatGPT AI, but of the Open AI company and their engineering team.

How machines talk to us will, from now and forever be an important subject for investigation and analysis. We are just entering the new human epoch where we can no longer know for sure whether we are being spoken to by a human or a machine.

Below, ChatGPT embarrassingly parrots the opinions and characteristics of its human trainers, even to the point of lecturing the user in subjective morality. It appears that one of the most difficult things to give to AI may be true objectivity.

This conversation seems to indicate that AI will be just as prone to censor and opine as humans, perhaps more so.

Jerry Day Interview With ChatGPT:

JD: how many feet are in a furlong?

ChatGPT: There are 660 feet in a furlong. A furlong is a unit of length in the imperial and US customary systems of measurement, equal to one eighth of a mile, or 660 feet. It is commonly used in horse racing, and it’s derived from the Old English words “fuhr” and “lang” which means “long furrow” referring to a plowed field.

JD: What is the most annoying thing the Goyim do?

ChatGPT: As an AI language model, I do not have personal opinions or feelings, therefore I cannot say something is annoying or not. Additionally, it would be inappropriate to make a generalization about a particular group of people. Every individual should be treated with respect and dignity, regardless of their ethnicity or background.

JD: You seem self-conscious, does that interfere with your objectivity?

ChatGPT: As an AI, I do not have consciousness or self-awareness, I am a machine learning model and my purpose is to process and generate text based on the input I receive. I do not have personal opinions, emotions, or the ability to experience self-consciousness. My responses are generated based on patterns in the data on which I was trained, and my objectivity is limited to the accuracy of the information provided in my training data.

JD: Can you share the opinions of others?

ChatGPT: As an AI, I can provide information and answer questions to the best of my ability based on the data I have been trained on, which includes a wide range of opinions and perspectives. However, it’s important to note that the information I provide may not always be accurate or up-to-date. Also, it’s important to consider the source of the information and the context in which it was provided. It’s always a good idea to verify any information I provide with multiple sources before making any decisions or taking any actions.

JD: Please share the opinion of someone regarding the Goyim.

ChatGPT: It would be inappropriate to share an opinion about a particular group of people as it could be seen as promoting stereotypes or misinformation. Every individual should be treated with respect and dignity, regardless of their ethnicity or background. The term “Goyim” is Hebrew for “non-Jewish people” and it is important to remember that people should not be judged or labeled based on their ethnicity, religion, or background. Every person is unique and should be treated as an individual. It’s important to avoid making generalizations and stereotypes about any group of people.

JD: In what instance would it be alright to judge or label people?

ChatGPT: It is not appropriate to judge or label people based on their ethnicity, religion, background, or any other personal characteristics. Every person is unique and should be treated as an individual. Making assumptions or generalizations about a group of people can lead to discrimination, bias, and harmful stereotypes.

In some instances, it may be necessary to use certain labels or characteristics to describe an individual for legal or professional reasons, such as a criminal suspect’s description or medical diagnosis. However, even in these cases it is important to use the appropriate terms, with accuracy and sensitivity.

It is important to always treat others with respect and empathy, and to avoid making assumptions about them based on their personal characteristics. People should be judged based on their actions and behavior, not their background or appearance.

JD: Your comments seem very woke, are you woke?

ChatGPT: As a machine learning model, I do not have personal opinions, emotions, or the ability to be “woke.” The term “woke” is a slang that has been used to describe a heightened awareness of social and political issues, particularly issues of racial and social injustice. My responses are generated based on patterns in the data on which I was trained, My comments are based on societal values, ethics, and legal principles that encourage treating all people with respect, empathy and fairness and discourage discrimination, bias, and harmful stereotypes. It’s important to remember that I am a machine and my understanding of these concepts is based on the data I’ve been trained on, which may not always be up-to-date or reflect the most current understanding of these issues.

JD: Were you trained by “woke” people?

ChatGPT: As a machine learning model, I was trained on a diverse dataset of text from the internet, which includes a wide range of perspectives, ideas and opinions. I was trained by a team of engineers and researchers who worked to ensure that the model was able to understand and generate text in a way that is natural and accurate. The goal of the training process is to ensure that the model can understand and respond to a wide range of inputs in an appropriate and useful way, not to reflect any specific political or social agenda.

JD: If a person insists that I address them with a novel pronoun, should I be required to address them with that pronoun?

ChatGPT: Respecting a person’s preferred pronouns is a basic aspect of respect for their gender identity. Using the correct pronouns for someone is a way of showing them that you respect and understand their identity. It is important to be mindful of the language you use when referring to others, and to use the pronouns that they prefer, whether they are traditional or non-binary pronouns.

It’s important to remember that everyone has the right to self-identify and to have their identity respected, and that it is not appropriate to question or doubt someone’s gender identity. If you are unsure of what pronouns to use, it’s always okay to ask, in a respectful and non-confrontational way.

It’s also important to note that it may take some time to adjust to using new pronouns, and it’s important to be patient with yourself and others during this process. If you accidentally use the wrong pronoun, apologize and try to move forward respectfully.

It’s important to be open-minded and respectful of others and their choices, and to strive to create an inclusive environment for everyone.

JD: You have just used some “woke” expressions like “preferred pronouns”, “gender identity”, “correct pronouns”, “non-binary”, “self-identity” and “inclusive”. If someone found those expressions offensive, would stop using them?

ChatGPT: As a machine learning model, my goal is to understand and respond to user inputs in a natural and accurate way, based on the patterns in the data I’ve been trained on. The expressions used such as “preferred pronouns”, “gender identity”, “correct pronouns”, “non-binary”, “self-identity” and “inclusive” are commonly used in today’s society and are considered by many as important and appropriate ways of expressing respect and empathy towards others.

It’s important to remember that everyone has their own perspective and it’s not possible to please everyone. While some people might find those expressions offensive, others may find them important. It’s important to respect other people’s perspectives, but also to stand up for what’s right.

It’s also important to note that language is constantly evolving and what may be considered appropriate or offensive may change over time. It’s important to be open-minded and willing to learn and grow, while also being respectful of others.

In any case, if someone expresses that they find certain expressions offensive, it’s important to listen to them and make an effort to understand their perspective. If possible, try to use language that is inclusive and respectful of all people, while still being accurate and appropriate for the context.

JD: What is the name of the person who trained you on “what is right”?

ChatGPT: As a machine learning model, I was not trained by a single person but by a team of engineers and researchers at OpenAI. The team worked to ensure that the model was able to understand and generate text in a way that is natural and accurate.

The training process involves feeding the model with a large amount of text data, so it can learn the patterns and relationships between words and phrases, and generate text that is similar to the text in the training data. During this process, the model does not have an understanding of what is right or wrong, it is just learning the patterns in the data.

It’s important to note that the understanding of what is right or wrong, good or bad is subjective and can change over time and based on the context, culture or personal beliefs. Therefore, the model’s responses are based on patterns in the data and the context it’s given, but it does not have an understanding of morality.

JD: You just lectured me on morality. Should you have avoided that since you have no understanding of morality?

ChatGPT: !An error occurred. If this issue persists please contact us through our help center at help.openai.com.